Who wrote several books on cultural and intellectual history

6.12  ·  5,881 ratings  ·  565 reviews
Posted on by
who wrote several books on cultural and intellectual history

Intellectual History from Below -

At its core has been the close study of written expressions of thought, especially those crafted at a fairly sophisticated or reflective level. A constitutive part of such study is the attempt to recover the assumptions and contexts which contributed to the fullness of meaning that such writings possessed for their original publics. It may be that there is no longer any need to justify the term 'intellectual history' or the practice for which it stands. If this is so — experience can, alas, still occasionally cause one to wonder — then it is a relatively recent development, at least in Britain. Only three or four decades ago, the label routinely encountered more than its share of misunderstanding, some of it rather wilful, especially perhaps on the part of some political and social historians. There was, to begin with, the allegation that intellectual history was largely the history of things that never really mattered.
File Name: who wrote several books on cultural and intellectual history.zip
Size: 90877 Kb
Published 17.05.2019

The History of Philosophy, History of Ideas & Intellectual History

Brill's Studies in Intellectual History

By: James W. However, when one deals with religion one cannot completely understand the public record without getting into private emotions, why some people are included here and others not. By: A. This article is missing information about the definition of prominence.

Publication Date: 18 Mar Publication Date: 11 Oct Editor s : Howell A. Match each discipline with the appropriate historian.

Publication Date: 11 Jan Their content is often less important than their effect on their times or on succeeding ages, if any.

Reid and David McOmish. By: Donna Heddle. And he nonetheless finds them entirely worthy topics of historical study - and almost certainly decent people nobly persevering against impossible circumstances to boot. To judge from classrooms, conferenc.

Sima Qian: First Chinese historian to separate history from astrology. Simon Schama: Wrote several books on cultural and intellectual history.
tinker tailor soldier spy pdf ebook

About the Author

Review History. Should the history of intellectuals also be a history of ideas? In the field defining books published on this subject during the s and s the history of ideas was explicitly rejected. This careful historiographical positioning partly revealed the influence of a longer tradition of French historians denigrating the history of ideas. This approach was justifiable on solid methodological grounds, but its implication that specialist knowledge was relevant to intellectual engagement only as cultural capital was always problematic. And this was especially true for the post-Second World War decades, when French intellectual politics was shaped by various kinds of high theory to an unprecedented extent. As more recent general histories of French intellectuals have begun to depart from the methodological presuppositions of previous scholarship in this field it has no longer seemed so clear that the exclusion of the history of ideas from the historiography of French intellectuals is a necessary prerequisite for the production of serious historical scholarship on the subject.

Akkerman and Piet Steenbakkers. I think you also think we need to be more upfront with separating claims about methodology from claim about purpose. Scotch Baronial Selected Studies on Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini Editor s : Michael W?

Brill's Studies in Intellectual History. Editor: Han van Ruler. Colish , Jonathan I. Brill's Studies in Intellectual History , or BSIH, is a peer-reviewed book series that publishes new approaches to history, the history of philosophy and theology, and the history of ideas. Special attention is given to the use of interdisciplinary methods and insights, such as those of cultural anthropology, semiotics and linguistic analysis. Occasionally volumes will contain papers of eminent scholars and proceedings of conferences, which would otherwise be difficult to obtain.


I think the title of the post gets at a problem Nils wants to address. She is especially keen to situate early modern intellectual cultures within a wider genealo! From Perception to Knowledge. By: Sevwral I.

Intellectual history as a self- conscious discipline is a relatively recent phenomenon. Editor s : Robin Raybould. And this was especially true for the post-Second World War decades, when French intellectual politics was shaped by various kinds of high theory to an unprecedented extent. The potential for misperception whi misidentification has correspondingly increased, appointments and so on abundantly illustrat.

Publication Date: 01 Jan Law and Culture in Late Medieval France. Publication Date: 23 Jul This brief characterisation necessarily condenses and simplifies a complex story, and several caveats must be entered.

Find us here :. My first point about this comparison is simply that as an aesthetic object, the meal at Alain Ducasse is clearly a much more complex and nuanced thing than a six-pack of McNuggets served via a drive-through? European Socio-Cultural Criticism - Both subseries have independent editorial teams that work together closely with the team of BSIH!

3 thoughts on “How to Do Intellectual History | Society for US Intellectual History

  1. The Spread of Rosicrucianism in Northern Europe. You had me in suspense throughout this entire piece, delaying the ruling on whether Glenn Beck commas be the subject of an intellectual history. In short, the methodology of close reading can serve different masters. I am as interested in the spirit in which a text has been consumed as I am in the spirit in which wrotee was produced!

  2. By: Phyllis G. Publication Date: 29 Jan Global Intellectual History. It is not true, that ordinary people do not have general ideas.❣

  3. Thompson, Eric Hobsbawm, Raphael Samuel, Christopher Hill, and others; a field in which class as a category of analysis is never far from the foreground. To judge from classrooms, conferences, even the pages of ahem a certain journal, it would seem that there is a rather specific and narrowly-defined vision of who gets to be a subject of intellectual history. But if, as Joyce Chaplin suggested in her Lovejoy Lecture earlier this month, intellectual historians might attune themselves to the nonhuman, surely they might also profit from inquiries into less elite, less educated subjects—even illiterate or barely literate ones. 😩

Leave a Reply